Unless there are very serious doubts (in which case, should the project be going ahead?), most client-consultant relationships and projects start off with the necessary levels of enthusiasm required. Of course, starting is one thing, getting traction and making progress is another. There can be any number of challenges that can slow down or even derail a project.
Whether there is progress or not really comes down to the enthusiasm and commitment of the client and the consultant. While the consultant has some influence, the only person’s opinion that really matters within a business is the business owner (or in some cases head of function, project manager, etc). Without the continued support of this person and those people whom he or she delegates responsibility to, the project will suffer and eventually die.
Of course, the people in those positions have many demands on their time and cannot always find the time for lengthy meetings to discuss projects. The problem is of course, without these discussions, projects can go off track or not make any progress.
Fortunately, there are ways of avoiding these situations. The important thing is to agree them at the start. Suitable tactics can include having alternative ways to meet or communicate. Also ensuring that meetings, presentations, and even just simple conversations cover what is required but are concise.
The other important point is that must always be trust and respect on both sides. Obviously, both need to be earned and it is the consultant’s responsibility to earn that trust from, in the case of a new client, a starting point of zero. Trust can be built quickly. From the first conversations it should be easy to see from the quality of the questions, listening and answers if trust is building on both sides. Once trust is built it needs to be maintained. The only way to do this is through regular contact and delivering on what has been agreed.
There must also be some appreciation that eventually all good things come to an end. Rather than trying to avoid this discussion it is perhaps better to discuss it at the start and continually reconfirm along the way. There can be no place for complacency or expectation. The client is free to choose who to work with. Equally the consultant should only be working for the client while there is the need and appreciation.
Setting terms that suit both parties is important. For example, agreeing to have a monthly review meeting, either face to face or by web meeting, is essential. That way progress can be shown, and any issues can be discussed.
Short project periods can build trust quicker than long project periods. Why? Because there is less risk to both parties. One month or 90-day projects tend to have very clear and defined goals. This means that they can be measured. This approach monitors performance and with good results comes credibility and trust. It also is a way for either party to call time if it looks clear that there is insufficient progress, need, commitment, or enthusiasm to achieve the desired goals. Long term projects should in theory be solid as trust will already be in place. However, without some controls and reporting, this is sometimes where complacency and expectation can start to creep in. Every challenge should be a unique project, and each project should be approached as if it is the first one with the client and possibly the last.
Short payment terms are also important. Non-payment, or even slow payment, can be a sign of client dissatisfaction, so it is important to pick up on anything like that very quickly to understand and rectify any problems urgently. Payment terms of every seven days or no longer than two weeks are vital. Red flags can immediately be raised and any issues quickly addressed. Working this way also associates client money spent with the recent time period while the project and activities are fresh in everyone’s mind.
Transparency is also important. Rather than as some consultants do, charging by the day, or the half day, I have always measured time in smaller blocks, even by the minute. I have also provided a very detailed breakdown of time spent on each task. This enables me to stop and start work on a client project as necessary. It also provides an opportunity to build trust and for the client to suggest that more or less time and money may need to be diverted from one activity on another. This method is not an invitation to renegotiate terms after work has been done in good faith, but an opportunity to get better, sharper, and more productive.
In summary clients and consultants should only be working together when there is the need that has been appreciated and where the efforts of both parties are appreciated. Setting out agreed standards at the start and reconfirming them and if necessary adjusting them along the way can help keep both the relationship and the performance on track.
Cookie | Duration | Description |
---|---|---|
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional | 11 months | The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". |
viewed_cookie_policy | 11 months | The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data. |